Showing posts with label book riot. Show all posts
Showing posts with label book riot. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Great American Read Result Is a Yawn... But the Process Was Eye-Opening

After months of voting for PBS's Great American Read, readers  have named To Kill a Mockingbird America's favorite book.
.
.
.

Shocker. 

The result had to be something that scads of people have read and loved, and even though The Great American Read was about finding America's favorite book, not finding the great American book, it seemed likely that Americans would stump for an American work (although the top ten out of the one hundred books up for voting was 50/50 American and British books). Given the continued prevalence of To Kill a Mockingbird on middle school and high school syllabii, its accessibility, and its themes that speak to what feel like distinctly American issues with near-universal applicability, it would have been *wild* to me if To Kill a Mockingbird had not come out at the top of this list of one hundred titles.* Just, statistically, how could it have been otherwise?

Which leads me to the question I asked myself when I first heard about The Great American Read, which was, why bother? "Harry Potter, Rings, Pride and Prejudice, possibly Jane Eyre and Moby Dick will all be high on the list," I thought to myself as soon as I heard about this summer of voting for "our" favorite read. "Gone with the Wind probably on the list, and Great Gatsby. To Kill a Mockingbird wins." Here are the top ten, per PBS's site:


  1. To Kill a Mockingbird
  2. Outlander (Series)
  3. Harry Potter (Series)
  4. Pride and Prejudice
  5. Lord of the Rings
  6. Gone with the Wind
  7. Charlotte's Web
  8. Little Women
  9. Chronicles of Narnia
  10. Jane Eyre


 Gatsby was #15, Moby Dick #46.

Look, I'm not trying to toot my own horn here. It's not that I have some remarkable magic finger on the pulse of bookish America or something. My point is that you don't have to have your finger on the pulse of anything to predict this with decent accuracy.** If you have any sense of what Americans are made to read in school and what has historically resonated with a lot of them, this list was utterly predictable. And there's been some confused noises along those lines from some bookish media. (A recent episode of the Book Riot Podcast gives a decent discussion of the Heh? aspects of The Great American Read as a project. Minute 18:18-26:55.***)

But I wonder if focusing on the result, on the "winner" after all this voting, is maybe to look past the value of doing something like The Great American Read the way PBS did it. They didn't just do a poll, giving out a list and asking people to pick their favorites. They made a series of documentary programs about the one hundred books on the original list and organized community and library events related to the book list. I've watched most of the documentaries (if there were community or library events in my area, I didn't hear about them), and while those TV episodes certainly aren't the most inspired bits of documentary television you're ever going to see (it's mostly talking heads, with the occasional kinda neat animated graphic), I  enjoyed watching them, and most of all thrilled to see people talk passionately about the books they love. The episodes feature interviews with many authors, both about their own books that are on the list and about other books on the list that have meant something to them, as well as interviews with other book-adjacent folk discussing why various books are important to them personally, or culturally, or historically. The documentaries aren't terribly nuanced. You won't, for instance, find much considered criticism of any of the books.**** However, the point wasn't to consider these works fully, but to convince you to read them. And as much as I also find the idea of voting to name Americans' favorite read a little pointless (see the top ten list), impossibly fraught logistically (who actually voted? who had the opportunity to vote? in what ways was the voting system that allowed you to vote for each book once a day for months being gamed? which huge swathes of readers didn't have their voice represented because they don't watch or pay any attention to PBS?*****), and rather reductive (the one hundred books they started with is a much more interesting and representative list than the final "winner," or even the top ten), I'm glad The Great American Read was there trying to convince me to read these books. After watching the various episodes of the show, I am inspired to read (or in two cases, reread) these eight books:
  
  1. Ghost
  2. Tales of the City
  3. Bless Me, Ultima
  4. The Great Gatsby
  5. A Prayer for Owen Meany
  6. A Separate Peace
  7. Dune
  8. The Joy Luck Club

Some of these I'd never heard of before, some I'd known about but just never heard anything that prompted me to read them, some I've read and thought I was done with. Maybe that was the point all along. To encourage us and inspire us to read, and to read beyond our current horizons. And that is no bad thing.


What did you think of The Great American Read? Did you watch the show? Did you vote? Is your favorite on the top ten list? 


*According to The Great American Read finale episode, To Kill a Mockingbird started out on the first day of voting in the number one position and never fell from it.
**I think the only genuine surprise in this top ten is Outlander, a book I love (I've only read the first of the series) and which I know a lot of other people do too. But I would never have thought of it in this context. There's been some speculation that there was a concentrated effort by Outlander fans to vote as often as they could to get the book/series as high up the rankings as possible. *shrug* The Great American Read voting system was designed in a way that clearly allowed (even encouraged?) people to do just that, so the fact that some people may have done so feels like a legit part of this particular voting process. It does make me really curious to see data on numbers of unique votes for each of these books though. Like, if Outlander received 100 votes (small numbers here for convenience), how many of them came from the same ten people over time? I'm curious about this for every book on here; Outlander just brings the question to the fore. The finale claims that it took at least 56,196 votes for a book to make it into the top twenty list, but they said nothing about how many (or whether they even know) of those were unique votes.
***For a correction to/discussion of the statement in this episode that the top ten list is 100% white, see the next episode of the podcast. It's to do with Diana Gabaldon's Hispanic ancestry.
****If you haven't read Roxane Gay's article in which she explains why she doesn't "harbor reverence and nostalgia" for To Kill a Mockingbird, do.
*****According to the final episode of The Great American Read, over four million votes were received. If every one of those were a unique vote (certainly they weren't, based on the voting system's design allowing individuals to vote many more times than once), that would only be slightly more than 1% of the population of the US. Also, while many of the books by authors of color on the list of one hundred ended up high in the rankings, the fact that the bottom ten of the one hundred books was almost fully books by authors of color was both heartbreaking and telling about whose voices maybe weren't included here, despite the project's clear efforts to make the episodes of the show themselves pretty inclusive.

Wednesday, March 28, 2018

What to Do with Problem Books?

In the past few months, several scandals have hit the book/publishing world involving revelations about the behavior of several authors. Other writers and commentators have investigated the myriad reactions of readers to these events and the various implications they have for publishing, and I do not feel like I have anything particularly useful to add to those excellent conversations. Here I would like to talk about a very specific piece of the fallout for readers when an author suddenly feels unworthy of one's attention, but if you would like to dive into the issues themselves, here are some links:

*Sherman Alexie accused of harrassment
*Book Riot Podcast discussion of harassment allegations in children's publishing (start at minute 11:30)
*Santino Hassell accused of catfishing (NSFW: language; TW: emotional abuse)
*Riptide's Statement about Hassell
*When in Romance podcast discussion of Hassell (minute 4:45-17:05)
*The Hopeless Romantic podcast discussion of Hassell and Riptide Publishing (NSFW: language; TW: sexual and emotional abuse)

Right. Now. What do I want to talk about? It's a minor consideration in the face of an ocean of feels including disgust and disappointment toward an author, empathy for victims, distrust of aspects of the publishing industry, and personal questions for readers about how to feel about beloved texts that now seem tainted. But it's a problem I've been considering now for a couple of weeks: What will I do with books I no longer wish to own because I no longer want to have anything to do with the author? 

This particular spate of revelations has not involved any authors whose work is deeply meaningful to me personally, so I have not yet had to grapple with changing feelings about a book that means a lot to me. And I think this is a very real, very important issue. Books matter. They matter because they show us ourselves when we thought we were the only one. They matter because they show us people and worlds we otherwise might never begin to understand. They matter because they help us through difficult times. So if a book that mattered, a book that got me through something, or helped me realize something about myself, turned out to have been written by someone engaging in behavior I find reprehensible, that would make me feel some kind of way. Given the apparent prevalence of such behavior in our societies and how much I read, I suspect someday I will be writing a blog post about what that feeling turns out to be. But for today, I am wondering only about the practical. I now have some books in my possession that didn't matter much to me (in many cases which I hadn't yet had a chance to read) and which I would no longer like to own. 

My recent experiences with trying to keep my bookshelves from taking over the entire house mean that I have some go-to options for ridding myself of unwanted books. There's a nice used book store in town that will buy select used books in good condition; there's another one that will take select used books for store exchange. Our library is always in need of donations. So is the Goodwill. I have friends and family and fellow book club members I sometimes pass books on to if I have no more need for them. Supposedly there are some Little Free Libraries in town where I could drop books off for others in my community to find. All of these are great destinations for books that have served their purpose, for books I'm happy to let go out into the world and be the right book for someone else even if they are no longer the right book for me. But these seem like wrong choices for books I don't want anymore because it turns out their authors have engaged in garbage behavior I can't look past. I don't donate expired food to the food bank; I don't want to donate books that feel nasty to the library.

Practically speaking, I guess, a book is just paper and glue. I could throw them away. Better yet, I could recycle them. (Some books even have a note on the copyright page indicating that they are suitable for recycling. This note always draws me up short. No one drops their book in the recycling bin after they turn the last page, surely? There are so many better ways to "recycle" most books.) Neither of these options feels exactly appropriate either. I try not to over-romanticize books and I try not to anthropomorphize them and I try not to conflate a physical book with the flesh-and-blood human who wrote it. Dropping a novel in the trash is not tossing a human out with the garbage, but darn if I still don't feel comfy thinking about doing it. 

I haven't been able to come up with a great solution to this small problem that feels right to me. (I'm sure there are other people who would (who have) literally trashed books for these sorts of reasons, and hey, you do you. Probably there are also other people who have donated such books to the library or what have you. It isn't, after all, the donator's responsibility to look out for the donatee's sensibilities when it comes to reading material. I'm not here to judge, but *I* can't do it.) So for now, the books in question are tucked away behind other books on my shelves, their spines turned in. They get to carry on existing, but I don't have to look at them. In this case, it's an example of out of sight, very much still on my mind.

Wednesday, October 4, 2017

So You Want to Read a Romance Novel

Recently an article appeared in The New York Times Book Review rounding up romance novels being released this fall, and the romance community reacted with disappointment, disgust, and bewilderment to its tone and stance. (See some of the best reactions pieces from Ron Hogan; Sarah Wendell from Smart Bitches, Trashy Books; and Amanda Diehl at BookRiot.) The editorial director of the books section at NYTBR has responded, and readers are even more annoyed at that tone-deaf, condescending response (see the comments section of that article). I thought about writing about my own reaction to the piece, but it would largely be repeating what so many have already said so well. So, instead, I give you a handful of recommendations for romance reads, selected from among my favorites. While each of these is a particular favorite of mine, they also provide a small sample of the variety of scenarios and issues romance novels examine. Follow the title links to Amazon for plot descriptions and the author links for more about each author. 

Contemporary, m/m
Explores a BDSM relationship between two men with a significant age difference. Exquisite writing and a story that turns stereotypes about BDSM on their head.

Contemporary, m/m
Centers around two young men navigating mental health issues as well as their budding relationship. Considered representation of depression, anxiety, and autism.

Contemporary m/f
Explores class and race issues and spotlights eating disorders in men.

Fantasy, m/m
Lush world building and a slow-burn examination of hatred, loyalty, and love.


Regency, m/f
Fascinating interactions between hero and heroine within the confines of regency-era society coupled with feminist sensibilities and a lot of wit.

Of course, these recommendations are limited to my own experience with romance and lack the full breadth of what the genre has to offer. For even more variety to explore, check out these lists:

Romance Reviews by Genre, Archetype, and Theme (Smart Bitches, Trashy Books)

Happy reading!


Wednesday, April 19, 2017

Bookish Podcasts for Your Earballs

I first started listening to podcasts a few years ago when Husbeast was away at a conference for work. It was just a few months after we'd moved into our house, and I was surprised by how unsettling I found being alone in such a big space, especially as I love alone time and lived alone myself for five years before we married. But I needed something to put in my ears to disrupt some of the overwhelming quiet, and voila! a podcast listener was born. Since then I have become quite a fan of the podcast, and I subscribe to something like a trillion of them. (I listen to slightly fewer than I subscribe to.) My favorites are ones that focus on books and reading (natch). I'm always on the lookout for more good ones to stick into my listening rotation, but today I share with you my favorites.

Get Booked, Weekly, Thursdays
This podcast is a book recommendation show from Book Riot, hosted by Amanda Nelson and Jenn Northington. Listeners submit recommendation requests detailing the kind of read they are looking for, and Amanda and Jenn provide recommendations and discuss why they think each rec suits the request. This show is my favorite source of book recs with reasons why the books are worth checking out. I always feel like I have a really good sense of whether I'll want to read a book after listening to Amanda or Jenn talk about it, rather than just gathering that someone thinks it's good.

What Should I Read Next?, Weekly, Tuesdays
Hosted by Anne Bogel of the blog Modern Mrs. Darcy, this show is another book recommendation show, but the format differs quite a bit from that of Get Booked. Anne interviews her guests on the show (guests are always big readers, and often have their toe in the book world in some other way as well, as book bloggers, or librarians, or book sellers or what have you), and asks each of them to tell her three books they love, one book they hate, and what they're reading at the moment. She then recommends three books for the guest based on what they tell her. I love this format, and while it's always fun to hear what Anne recommends (and I've added some things to my TBR based on those recs), the best part of this show for me is listening to other readers talk about what they love (and don't love) about books they've read.

Smart Podcast, Trashy Books, Weekly, Fridays
This romance-themed podcast is hosted by Sarah Wendell of the romance review site Smart Bitches, Trashy Books. The show typically features an interview with a romance writer, conducted by Sarah. Occasionally an episode will be in discussion format with several of the "bitches" from the website and focus on a topic of interest to romance readers. I think of this as a sure-thing dose of smart, interesting women to look forward to each week, and listening to this podcast has solidified my slow but steady transmogrification into a romance reader over the past few years (about which, more in a forthcoming blog post).

The Book Riot Podcast, Weekly, Mondays
A bookish news podcast hosted by Jeff O'Neal and Rebecca Schinsky of Book Riot, their tagline is "a weekly news and talk show about what's new, cool, and worth talking about in the world of books and reading," and that sums it up pretty well. Every week Jeff and Rebecca talk about the handful of news stories from the book world that strike them as the most interesting, relevant, fun, or upsetting. This is my absolute favorite source for news about what's going on bookishly. If you tune in, it won't be long before you hear a "Jeff Rant." They are the best.

The Librarian Is In, Weekly (newly!), Thursdays
Hosted by two New York Public Library librarians, Gwen Glazer and Frank Collierius, this show is perhaps the least consistent in its format of my favorites, but it is consistent in its delivery of entertaining and fascinating book and book-adjacent content. Sometimes Gwen and Frank interview a guest (often someone involved in the NYPL system), and sometimes they just chat about books, often recommending one book and one non-book thing to each other. They also play a game where guests read them a passage from a book and Gwen and Frank try to guess where it came from. I always think that section is going to be dull, but then I get really into it, often yelling at my phone what my guess is!

The Tolkien Professor, Drop days of new content varies
Professor Corey Olsen, medievalist and Tolkien scholar, records lectures about all things Tolkien and makes them available through his podcast. There are numerous off-shoot shows (all available by subscribing to The Tolkien Professor podcast) about a range of topics, from the adaptation of The Hobbit into film to Middle Earth-based online games. By far the best content as far as I'm concerned are the lectures about The Lord of the Rings. Those lectures are complete, so if you're interested, you can just go binge them all right now. (What are you waiting for? Go!)

Witch, Please, Drop days of new content varies
Hannah and Marcelle, the hosts of Witch, Please, discuss Harry Potter, largely from a feminist perspective. Over the course of the show, they talk about each of the books and all eight movies (and occasionally something else related to HP, such as real-life Quidditch leagues). The discussion generally has a fairly academic bent, but they do a great job of keeping non-academic listeners up to speed. Hannah and Marcelle always seem to be having an excellent time doing the episodes, and a great deal of humor shines through. Production of new episodes has dropped off significantly, but all the HP primary sources are covered in the available material, so when you get to the end of the eps, you may feel like you wish there were more (like I do), but you won't feel like you've been left hanging.


(Podcast links above take you to the web presence for each show. Invariably, the best way to listen, however, is to subscribe through your podcatcher of choice. If you're looking for a new (or your first) podcatcher, your Google-fu should snag you some good recommendation lists for Iphone and Android. I use Podcast Addict. It does the thing.)