As I continue to think
about books and how I want them, their physical selves, in my space
and what I want that to look like, I keep coming back to the idea of the
"core" books that hold meaning for me. These core books are those
(relatively) few out of the thousands in our house that are the absolute most
important, the ones that, if I had to reduce my book collection to only what
would fit in one or two bookcases, would be the ones sitting in that honored
space.
I can't quite imagine actually
reducing my collection that far (unless out of necessity brought on by
circumstances, such as dramatically reduced living space), but it has been
helpful to me to think about what those collections would be--and to create
them digitally through the collections function on LibraryThing. I have created
four collections there:* Core Heart, the clutch-them-to-my-chest reads that are
my absolute favorites; Core Head, the books that speak more to my head than my
heart that I would feel somehow lost without; Secondary Heart, chest clutchers
that just aren't quite important enough to me to be core; Secondary Head, ditto
for those "head" books that I could probably do without but would
very much rather not.
This has been a fascinating
process, though one that constantly threatens to descend into the depths of
absurd hairsplitting. (Is Harry Potter's Bookshelf head or
heart? Okay, but is it core or secondary?) I find that if I stop
thinking about it so hard, most of the books I've considered (many of my books
are definitely not even in contention) fall pretty solidly into one of those
four categories. The trick is to stop thinking. That's the hard
bit.
Some things I've learned by
doing this so far:
*Most of my Core Heart books
are things I read early in my life--if not in childhood, then certainly by my
early twenties. This feels both right and slightly sad. (Cue Kathleen Kelly
quote about childhood reading.) Right because, well, childhood reading. Sad
because *sobs* why can't reading be like it was when I was twelve anymore?
*Despite the fact that I mostly
can't seem to read series these days, a lot of the books in my Core Heart
collection *are* series (Harry Potter, the Little House books, the Minnesota
Christmas romance novels, The Lord of the Rings (that one is not really a
series, but in the sense that I read three books back-to-back-to-back.) I
suspect this points to my love of character over any other element of
fiction.
*Books I've read more recently
that end up in Core Heart are more likely to be graphics-based than not
(comics, graphic novels, picture books).
*The line between Core Heart
and Core Head is not terribly logical, but it is the distinction I have the
least trouble feeling. JRR Tolkien's collected letters are Core
Heart; C.S. Lewis's are Core Head. Pride and Prejudice is Core
Heart; the rest of Austen's novels are Core Head.
I still have some work to do on
the collections--every other day or so a thought strikes me in the shower or
over breakfast: "Did I put such-and-such book into one of my core
collections?!" And of course they will get fine-tuned over time, with
books shuffling among collections, new reads getting slotted in, and perhaps,
the odd book falling from favor entirely.
What books would you put in a
core collection? And would you divide them differently than I have (or not at
all?)
*If you're, like, super interested,
you can navigate to those collections on LT through my profile.
I really like this division! Fascinating how different books of the same genre end up being Heart vs. Head. I'll have to ponder my own collection. One thing I've noticed is that upon further re-reading, books that began as Core Head for me (Beowulf, Hamlet) are becoming closer and closer to Heart the longer I re-read them. THOUGHTS?!
ReplyDeleteOoo, yes, that makes sense to me. I think a lot of my Head books might very well get closer and closer to my heart as time goes on.
Delete